Funding Expert Academy Toolkit
Funding Expert Academy Toolkit consists of two files:
a) Student Workbook
b) Resources Folder
Both files are very valuable for anyone interested in being successful in European funding with a fraction of the effort applied by other winning applicants.
Especially the Resources Folder contains examples and content valuable for facilitating the development and writing of your grant application. It is considered the "Swiss army knife" for winning grant applications.
The Funding Expert Academy Student Workbook is the exact workbook that is used by students in Funding Expert Academy Programme (normal price is 1997 EUR!). The participants in the Funding Expert Academy Programme are actively engaged by filling in the gaps (missing information) while they watch the training videos and at the end of the course, they have a step-by-step guide on how to develop successful proposals in any programme and/or how to get involved as partners in successful proposals initiated by others.
You can purchase immediately the electronic versions!
WHY ARE WE OFFERING THIS?
A great Idea is not enough
An excellent project proposal is essential. In order to prepare one, most winners have relied on outsourced EU proposal experts. But good experts are expensive and have only limited time. This means that organisations, that already have funding, also have the best chances to succeed. But it should be exactly the opposite. The EU funds should support those projects that cannot be realized due to lack of or insufficient funding.
Fair opportunity for everyone
We decided to change this and give everybody a fair opportunity to get their project funded. This is how the H2020 Manuals were born. We decided to share our knowledge and know-how in this manual and make it accessible to larger public at just a fraction of the regular cost. In this way we can help more great ideas succeed and we give an opportunity to all those, who cannot afford a one-on-one consultancy.
Our experience shows that...
Most of the winning proposals use similar writing approach, formation and tricks that allow them to be assessed fast and earn exceptional evaluation scores. On the other hand, most of the rejected SME Instrument proposals fail to deliver the right information, contain fatal mistakes or drop out essential but not obvious elements that are critical for success.